|
A/A-
[Excellent] |
B+/B
[Good] |
Thesis |
crystal
clear, persuasive, insightful, original |
understandable
or promising, yet rather unclear or unoriginal |
Structure |
evident, solid
and smooth, appropriate to the topic/thesis |
largely
identifiable despite a few orphaned sentences or paragraphs |
Use of
Evidence |
present
when required, seamlessly & creatively integrated into topic and
supportive sentences, accurately documented [MLA or Chicago] |
occasionally
insufficient, inaccurate or inappropriate, yet largely reasonable |
Analysis |
interpretative
labor of thinking, fresh, incisive, to the point |
mini-theses
broadly supported despite occasional loss of focus |
Logical
Steps |
mini-theses
solidly and fluidly constructed, counter-arguments and/or immediately
relevant points considered and/or mentioned |
usually
and generally reasonable, yet weak due to lack of dialectical reasoning
and/or explorative thinking |
Mechanics |
flawless
grammar, precise diction, (near-)perfect punctuations |
occasional
lapses in grammar and diction, minor copy-editing issues (10%) |
|
|
|
|
B-/C+
[Borderline/Mediocre] |
C/C-
[Needs Help] |
Thesis |
generally
unclear, vague or unoriginal despite some visible attempts |
difficult or
too bland to identify, nearly absent |
Structure |
generally
unclear with too many orphaned sentences or paragraphs |
unclear or
confusing, in need of more topic sentences |
Use of
Evidence |
generally insufficient
or inappropriate, poorly integrated external source |
very few
or weak, unintegrated citations |
Analysis |
weak, uninterpreted, irrelevant or contradictory citations
and/or authorial thoughts that require more analytic attention |
very little
or weak attempt to relate evidence or thoughts to argument |
Logical
Steps |
often weak
or fallacious, counter-arguments or alternatives unrepresented |
no visible
flow of ideas, no effort to grasp alternative views |
Mechanics |
Notable
problems in grammar and diction (30%) |
Critical
problems in grammar and diction (50%) |
|
|
|
|
D/D-
[Poor/Disastrous] |
|
Thesis |
extremely
weak; unsupported by the rest of the paper |
|
Structure |
evidently
unorganized, almost nonexistent |
|
Use of
Evidence |
weak or
incorrect or nonexistent |
|
Analysis |
absent |
|
Logical
Steps |
no
discernable argument made |
|
Mechanics |
Almost
unreadable grammar and diction, major rewriting required (70%) |
|